As a reader, I found the beginning of this book a little confusing - but in a good way. At first it seemed that I had missed some big elements of the story (I thought maybe I was too sleepy when I was reading the first two chapters), but I eventually realized that I was receiving information as the author intended. Sometimes I find it rewarding when an author chooses to dispense puzzle pieces in a seemingly random manner - I feel so much more grateful for the pieces than if they were just handed out in sequential order.
A note of caution: While I found this novel incredibly satisfying, there are moments of stark violence ... as I said - Cleave pulls no punches. But I find, in media these days, that there's violence for the sake of entertainment, and there's violence for the sake of awakening us in a didactic sense. And, for me, the violence of the second nature, while sometimes more difficult to stomach, is the better kind of violence to bear. Because if it's just for the sake of entertainment, then what does it say about our society??
I love it when authors give info a little bit at a time and let me weave it together on my own. It can't be an easy thing to do successfully. But honestly, having never really written anything, I don't know that for sure. And totally agree with your commentary on violence for the sake of entertainment. Makes me think about gladiators and the colosseum.
ReplyDeleteI was totally going to put something about the gladiators - glad I'm not the only one who sees the similarities. Thanks for commenting!
ReplyDelete